Omar Armas Aleman wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Damion K. Wilson wrote:
> > If 192.168.0.2 can ping 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.1.2 can ping 192.168.1.1,
> > then you have a routing problem. 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.1.1 must each
> > routing table entries that reference the other. Both 192.168.0.2 and
> > 192.168.1.2 must also have routing table entries specifying the firewalls
> > as their routers for the other networks.
> This is my routing table in 192.168.1.1:
> [root@kaos /root]# route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref UseIface
> 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 cipcb0
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 cipcb0
These two lines make no sense at all. You say that 0.1 can be reached by
dev cipcb0, and also that 1.0 can be reached by the same device. Yet, if
you look at your picture in the last mail you sent, this is nonsense.
> Any idea about what can be the problem?
Marc Mutz <Marc,AT,Mutz,DOT,com> http://EncryptionHOWTO.sourceforge.net/
University of Bielefeld, Dep. of Mathematics / Dep. of Physics
PGP-keyID's: 0xd46ce9ab (RSA), 0x7ae55b9e (DSS/DH)