<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

Subject: Re: Final resort CIPE routing question
From: "Yannick Vansevenant" <yannick.vansevenant,AT,mobyus,DOT,com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:58:50 +0100
In-reply-to: <003101c07a48$2d0bb5b0$be01a8c0@trollslayer>

Hello,

I changed the route and now everything looks like this :

on CRUX :

[root@crux domme]# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
Iface
192.168.0.10    localhost       255.255.255.255 UGH   0      0        0 lo
192.168.0.15    localhost       255.255.255.255 UGH   0      0        0 lo
192.168.0.47    localhost       255.255.255.255 UGH   0      0        0 lo
192.168.1.252   *               255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0
cipcb0
192.168.0.131   localhost       255.255.255.255 UGH   0      0        0 lo
192.168.254.0   *               255.255.255.240 U     0      0        0 eth0
192.168.1.0     192.168.1.252   255.255.255.0   UG    0      0        0
cipcb0
192.168.0.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth1
127.0.0.0       *               255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 lo
default         192.168.254.1   0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
[root@crux domme]# ping 192.168.1.252
PING 192.168.1.252 (192.168.1.252) from 192.168.0.252 : 56(84) bytes of
data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.252: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=107.251 msec
64 bytes from 192.168.1.252: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=100.247 msec

--- 192.168.1.252 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 100.247/103.749/107.251/3.502 ms
[root@crux domme]# ping 192.168.1.190
PING 192.168.1.190 (192.168.1.190) from 192.168.0.252 : 56(84) bytes of
data.

<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]