<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

Subject: Re: Scalability of CIPE (fwd)
From: ewheeler,AT,kaico,DOT,com
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:12:52 +0200
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106261205050.15220-100000@p38mraz.cbu.pvt.cz>

My reccomendation would be to UTSL!

Look through the cipe module code for that conspicuous '99'.  I'm sure
it's just an integer limit somewhere.  99 Is too odd of a number for it to
be otherwise.

--Eric

On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Tom Mraz wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> sorry for reposting, but I need at least a partial answer and I don't know
> if someone catched my previous mail.
> 
> We have network with central servers, gateway/firewall and client machines
> over the Internet.
> I would like to know, how many client machines with CIPE can the central
> CIPE gateway handle. I see that the dynamic allocation allows up to 99 cipe
> devices. Is there any way how to raise this? There isn't heavy traffic from
> all of the client machines but they has to be connected simultaneously. What
> if we would have 1000 client machines, is it possible to use CIPE?
> Would it be too hard to rewrite cipe to share cipcb devices between more
> than 2 machines?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Tomas Mraz
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
>                                               Turkish proverb
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
> Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
> Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
> CIPE info and list archive: 
><URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>
> 





<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]