<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

Subject: Re: ciped problems
From: Karl Kleinpaste <karl,AT,charcoal,DOT,com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:49:04 +0200
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.31.0107232150340.8963-100000@inky>

"John M. Choi" <johnchoi,AT,its,DOT,caltech,DOT,edu> writes:
> kernel: cipcb0: setpar
...
> '/sbin/ifconfig cipcb0' gives:
> cipcb0    Link encap:IPIP Tunnel  HWaddr
>           POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1442  Metric:1

Notice that there are no addresses associated with cipcb0, even though
it is a P-t-P link.  Evidently, the attempt to use command line
arguments to set all needed attributes (the "setpar" complaint) did
not succeed.  How is e.g. your key parameter being set, if you are
using command line args?

> Does SMP make a difference? I tried reading back in the mailing list
> archives and there was mention of problems in v1.4.? with SMP machines.
> Both machines are SMP.

I have used CIPE in SMP kernels for eons and never had a problem; I've
been using CIPE since 0.5.6.





<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]