<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

Subject: Re: choice of ptpaddr and ipaddr
From: Ajit Kumar Kashyap <ajitkashyap,AT,yahoo,DOT,com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 04:48:11 +0200
In-reply-to: <GIBFAN00.91Q@smtp01.netkracker.com>

You can always create cipe interfaces with some other
RFC 1918 address like 172.16.x.x and add static route
at both ends.

Ajit

--- Manohar <m629,AT,netkracker,DOT,com> wrote:
> hi,
> i want to connect the two lans at geographically
> different locations using
> cipe.
> the lan 1 gateway machine has eth0 = 192.168.1.1 and
> eth1 = a.b.c.d
> the lan 2 gateway machine has eth0 = 192.168.2.1 and
> eth1 = w.x.y.z
> both a.b.c.d and w.x.y.z are real (internet) ip
> adresses.
> 
> in the options file on lan 1 gateway machine 
> ptpaddr = 192.168.2.1
> ipaddr = 192.168.1.1
> 
> my confusion is that this will result in both the
> cipe device and eth0
> having the same ip adress i.e 192.168.1.1
> simailar thing will happen on lan 2 gateway machine.
> 
> is it acceptable for ipaddr and eth0 to have the
> same ip address?
> thanks,
> manohar
> 
> 
> --
> Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
> Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe
> cipe-l" in body
> Other commands available with "help" in body to the
> same address.
> CIPE info and list archive:
<URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/





<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]