<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

Subject: Re: IP Tables bug?
From: Greg Louis <glouis,AT,dynamicro,DOT,on,DOT,ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 23:53:27 +0100
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110310758290.7756-100000@nylon.rope.net>

On 20011031 (Wed) at 1010:36 -0700, Ori Pessach wrote:

> At least as far as I can tell, the problem still existed with kernel 2.4.9 
> and the latest CIPE (1.5.2). If you're upgrading, you can still use 
>ipchains 
> on 2.4, and that works. That's what I'm doing now, but I don't like it. Are 
> any of the maintainers aware of this?
> 
> Ori
> 
> On Wednesday 31 October 2001 08:00, Roger Walker wrote:
> > I recall that, awhile back, there may have bee some issue between
> > the CIPE module and the 2.4 kernel's iptables code. Did this exist and, if
> > so, has it been rectified? I am looking to start upgrading systems to the
> > 2.4 kernel and need to make sure the VPNs will continue working. (Will a
> > CIPE on kernel 2.2 work with CIPE on kernel 2.4?)
> >
> >     Thanks.

I have been using cipe-1.5.2 between a machine runnning 2.2.19 and one
that's followed the -ac kernels all the way from 2.4.1-ac12 on up to
2.4.13-ac4 as well as running a few of Linus's releases along the way.
I have never seen any problem using iptables on the 2.4 end.  Have I
just been lucky?

-- 
| G r e g  L o u i s          | gpg public key:      |
|   http://www.bgl.nu/~glouis |   finger greg,AT,bgl,DOT,nu |

Header information for this message
(included within the PGP envelope for security reasons):
Subject: Re: IP Tables bug?
     To: CIPE ML <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
   From: Greg Louis <glouis,AT,dynamicro,DOT,on,DOT,ca>

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: "PGP signature"


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]