<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

Subject: Re: tunnel up but no encryption..
From: "Alex" <aoclarit,AT,kiwi,DOT,dhs,DOT,org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:23:17 +0100
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0201171348270.30127-100000@josefsbox.cjb.net>

ahh.. of course..damn made a fool of myself !! Well, I guess it just
bothered me that any unencrypted traffic could be captured at all but this
is only possible from the box itself as root so I'm not worried.

Thanks for your quick replies.

Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josef Drexler" <jdrexler,AT,josefsbox,DOT,cjb,DOT,net>
To: "CIPE Mailing List" <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: tunnel up but no encryption..

> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Alex wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > And secondly, yes I did make sure I captured the stuff on interface
cipcb0 I
> > also have a capturefilter (host 10.1.1.1 and 10.2.1.1) to make sure I
only
> > see the stuff between the 2 cipe interfaces. And the stuff looks exactly
> > like a normal telnet session.
>
> If you're looking at the traffic through cipcb0, you're looking at the
> tunneled traffic.  This will appear exactly as it is sent.
>
> To see the encrypted packets, you need to look at the carrier interface,
> and check out the UDP packets that carry the cipe packets.  The data
> contained in the UDP packets should be encrypted.
>
> --
>    Josef Drexler                 |    http://publish.uwo.ca/~jdrexler/
> ---------------------------------+---------------------------------------
>  Please help Conserve Gravity    | Email address is *valid*.
>  Stop flipping pancakes.         | Don't remove the "nospam" part.
>
>
>
> --
> Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
> Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
> Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
> CIPE info and list archive:
<URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>
>





<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]