<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

Subject: Re: connection refused
From: Karl Kleinpaste <karl,AT,charcoal,DOT,com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:09:03 +0100
In-reply-to: <20020211184603.16575.qmail@ubmail.ub.edu.ar>

"Norberto Altalef" <nalt,AT,ub,DOT,edu,DOT,ar> writes:
> The ciped-cb in the remote continues running when the error msg appears in
> the central site.
> No error messages in the remote site.

Very odd.

Are you sure that the port specification in the options files (both
ends) is correct?  The key exchange ECONNREFUSED really is directly
associated with there being no such port at the remote end, which
really does mean that there's no ciped-cb available where you're
expecting it.  So perhaps the "where" is wrong, in terms of an
incorrectly-specified port?  Check the "peer" entry of the local
config, or the "me" entry of the remote config.

Hm, but then you wouldn't ever get any traffic over the CIPE link.  If
the link ever works at all, then this couldn't be the problem, either.

Is it possible that there exist ipchains rules or other firewall
preventing this kind of traffic at some times?

<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]