Re: Stable NT based solution|
Damion Wilson <dwilson,AT,ibl,DOT,bm>|
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 20:38:27 +0200|
Can you elaborate ? The only problems I'm aware of in CIPE-Win32 are related
to unloading and reloading the adapter driver (hibernating, etc). I've never
seen problems with connecting and reconnecting to a cipe peer once the keys
On Thursday 04 July 2002 06:38 am, Yves Smolders wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> Does anyone here have tips on how to make 2 NT based machines (2000/XP/NT)
> connect stable?
> What build do you use, which SP etc... I still have crashes now & then, or
> connection loss
> Yves Smolders
> Hofline International
> tel +32 15 55 47 20
> fax +32 15 55 46 70
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andreas Dahlén" <andreas,AT,dahlen,DOT,ws>
> To: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
> Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 11:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Slow transfer over cipe-tunnel
> > Citerar Peter van den Heuvel <peter,AT,bank-connect,DOT,com>:
> > > > How could I check the UDP reply timeouts? Is there enything else
> > > > I could check? Some configuration options for Cipe?
> > >
> > > At least make sure ICMP is not blocked on any firewall. Various
> > > types are realy required.
> > >
> > > Also test every component in the chain (specially NIC's, links,
> > > routes).
> > > Get some data on TCP and UDP throughput, reliability and latencies.
> > > Packet loss will slow you down. But specially look at ICMP working.
> > Ahh! That was the problem. ICMP-packets where dropped on FW2, when I
> > accepted ICMP-packets it workt much better!
> > Thanks!
> > /Andreas
> > --
> > Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
> > Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
> > Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
> > CIPE info and list archive: