Comments are in-line:
Olaf Titz wrote:
>>I've read a couple of other posts from other people that have had problems
>>on Alpha. I believe it was assumed to be due to the 64bit long, but no-one
>64bit stuff, rather likely. I've zero experience with that (though
>most of the module code uses the kernel data types where appropriate).
Using the kernel data types is great. It was the crc32.c that was at
fault. I believe that it was programmed for DOS 16-bit mode because it
uses a long int for a 32 bit word. I havn't seen that since I last
programmed for DOS back in the olden days. =)
Anyway, the changes were quite simple. Should I make a diff for 1.5.4,
or get the development snapshot, or both?
>Alive, just a bit slow. Unfortunately I'm mostly confined to working
>on this stuff on weekends. Patches are welcome however.