<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

Subject: RE: Routing on Win2k
From: Tony Langdon <tlangdon,AT,atctraining,DOT,com,DOT,au>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:13:22 +0200

> So if I'm using 10/8 on the win32 end, with the machine's 
> physical adapter
> within that range, setting the CIPE adapter to 10.253.0.x 
> isn't going to
> work, or is it?

No it won't, if your netmask on the LAN is /8 (why are you using /8 on a
LAN??? )  If you were using 10.0.0/24, that IP above  would work for the
CIPE interface.
> 
> Does that mean I should find a different address range, like 
> 192.0.2.0/24
> for the endpoints of the tunnel?

If you really are using 10/8 and not something smaller like 10.0.0/24, yes
you will have to use a different range.  However, 192.0 is a public network,
use something from the 172/20 or 192.168/16 range (but don't allocate
anything bigger than a /24 to the tunnel (I's even go as small as a /29),
otherwise you're wasting private IP space that might be needed elsewhere in
your network.

---
Outgoing mail has been scanned for Viruses
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002
 

This correspondence is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential or legally privileged information or both. No confidentiality
or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this
correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your system and
notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or rely on any part of this
correspondence if you are not the intended recipient.

Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.





<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]