<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

Subject: RE: options config...
From: Amith Varghese <amith,AT,xalan,DOT,com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:03:45 +0100
In-reply-to: <7DB0958915FDD611961400A0C98F18460BCE70@WINTRIX.thermeon.com>

Thanks everyone.... things are up and running smoothly.  I used the internal 
IP
address for "me" and it now works.

Thanks
Amith

> ----- Message from SBNelson,AT,thermeon,DOT,com ---------
>     Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:22:16 -0800
>     From: "SBNelson,AT,thermeon,DOT,com" <SBNelson,AT,thermeon,DOT,com>
> Reply-To: "SBNelson,AT,thermeon,DOT,com" <SBNelson,AT,thermeon,DOT,com>
>  Subject: RE: options config...
>       To: "amith,AT,xalan,DOT,com" <amith,AT,xalan,DOT,com>, 
> "cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de" 
><cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
> 
> > I have the following setup as stated before in my last message
> >
> > Linux A--------NAT/Firewall---| Internet |-----------Linux B
> >
> >
> > Linux A has an internal IP address of 192.168.1.1.  The NAT/Firewall is
> > set up
> > so that all packets going to a particular IP (lets say 4.5.6.7) gets NATed
> > to
> > Linux A.
> >   So based on what everyone is telling me, I should set Linux
> > B's "peer" setting as 4.5.6.7:999?
> >
>       Yes
> 
> >   If that is the case what should be Linux
> > A's "me" setting (192.168.1.1 or 4.5.6.7 or 0.0.0.0)?
> >
>       Either 192.168.1.1 or 0.0.0.0
> 
> --
> Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
> Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
> Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
> CIPE info and list archive:
> <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>
> 
> 
> ----- End message from SBNelson,AT,thermeon,DOT,com -----





<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]