Re: Static routes to specific servers through VPN adapter (ratherthan connecting two subnets together)?|
Phil Scarratt <fil,AT,draxsen,DOT,com>|
Fri, 06 Jun 2003 15:51:49 +1000|
Yes it would. Simply make the mask 255.255.255.255 for each route on
Windows. By default (ie without adding any routes manually under
windows) you will only be able to acccess the linux firewall machine.
To do this, the easiest thing to do is to put the PEER ip addresses of
the CIPE link on a different subnet to either end - eg 192.168.3.x
Arne Kepp wrote:
Hi, I am currently in the process of building a new firewall with VPN support
and CIPE is currently my first choice, but I have a quick question:
Given the following configuration:
W2K machine with 192.168.2.5 on "eth0" on NATed network + CIPE VPN adapter
ADSL router with internal IP 192.168.2.1 , dynamic external IP
Linux firewall with fixed external IP yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy, internal ip 192.168.1.1
Servers with IPs 192.168.1.2 and 192.168.1.3
Say that the W2K client only needs access to those two servers, would it work
simply add a static route to 192.168.1.2 (and another one for .3) through the
VPN adapter? I do not want the VPN device to be the default gateway for all
traffic and I do not want to bridge the subnets.
Any better suggestions or links to howtos/tutorials/examples regarding windows
cipe clients would be appreciated too : )
Thank you ,
SysAdmin, Smallworld Systems AS
Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>
0403 53 12 71