"Greg Louis" <glouis,AT,dynamicro,DOT,on,DOT,ca>|
Re: ** Announcing CipeXpatch 1.5.4-1.00 (stable) **|
"Hans Steegers" <J.Steegers,AT,chello,DOT,nl>|
Sun, 15 Jun 2003 13:27:01 +0200|
"Hans Steegers" <steegers,AT,steegers,DOT,nl>|
>if one builds with pkcipe enabled, the pkcipe binary knows nothing about
As far as I can see, pkcipe doesn't have to know anything about the
I am not using PKCIPE, so I didn't test it. That's why I didn't include a
build script for it.
Just try it without the --disable-pkcipe option, and it probably will work
as long both sides are using the cixcb or cixdb devices.
If it doesn't work, please report it to me with some helpful debug info.
From: Greg Louis <glouis,AT,dynamicro,DOT,on,DOT,ca>
To: cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Date: Sunday, June 15, 2003 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: ** Announcing CipeXpatch 1.5.4-1.00 (stable) **
>On 20030615 (Sun) at 1119:38 +0200, Hans Steegers wrote:
>> ** Announcing CipeXpatch 1.5.4-1.00 (stable) **
>> ** Data compression/eXpansion for CIPE 1.5.4. **
>Will there be support for pkcipe in some future version? At present
>(and IMHO it would be a service to potential users to mention this on
>the website) the scripts contain --disable-pkcipe, and if one builds
>with pkcipe enabled, the pkcipe binary knows nothing about cipex.
>I'd love to try out cipex but I can't do without pkcipe.
>| G r e g L o u i s | gpg public key: finger |
>| http://www.bgl.nu/~glouis | glouis,AT,consultronics,DOT,com |
>| http://wecanstopspam.org in signatures fights junk email |
>Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
>Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
>Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
>CIPE info and list archive: