"Michael Piko" <michael,AT,piko,DOT,com,DOT,au>,"CIPE Mailing list" <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>|
Re: Problems tunneling XP to linux|
"Micha Nelissen" <mdvpost,AT,hotmail,DOT,com>|
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:42:00 +0200|
<001b01c336b7$e15b7bd0$0f00000a@bug> <3EF24886.email@example.com> <003701c336bf$0ba6cc80$0f00000a@bug> <BAY1-DAV55DabigPasS0005c7c2@hotmail.com> <007301c336ec$e5081600$0f00000a@bug>|
Michael Piko wrote:
> Sorry for not clearing that up.
> My real network is the 10.0.0.0/24 range.
> My virtual tunnel is 192.168.100.x (PTP connection)
> when testing,
> ping 10.0.0.9 from 10.0.0.253 = no worries
> ping 192.168.100.1 from 192.168.100.2 = problems
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Micha Nelissen" <mdvpost,AT,hotmail,DOT,com>
> To: "Michael Piko" <michael,AT,piko,DOT,com,DOT,au>
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Problems tunneling XP to linux
>>> My local (real) subnet is 10.0.0/24.
>>> The XP machine is 10.0.0.253 and the Linux machine is 10.0.0.9.
>>> No drama pinging the 10.0.0.x addresses of any machine.
>> When you ping 10.0.0.9 (is that what you're trying?) windows
>> probably pings the local subnet, not the remote linux one. Shouldn't
>> the subnet of the two CIPE connnections be apart? What does 'route
>> print' say in a cmd.exe prompt?
>> Just a thought,