| To: | "Damion Wilson" <dwilson,AT,ibl,DOT,bm> |
| Subject: | Re: java |
| From: | "Russell Berry" <russ,AT,berrex,DOT,com> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:55:08 -0400 |
| Cc: | <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de> |
| References: | <10d901c33bf2$d6525430$1401010a@berrex.com> <200306261725.49984.dwilson@ibl.bm> <111b01c33c2d$ad306250$1401010a@berrex.com> <200306270013.12335.dwilson@ibl.bm> |
Hey Damion, I apologize if I offended you in some way, I assure you that was not my intention. My personal experience with win/cipe has had limited success. I love linux-linux cipe tunnels, as they are they only VPN that will hold up on a two way satellite connection for a sustainted period of time. The problems I've experienced with Windows range from blue screens to non-specific network failures while using that cipe adapter/service. I cut my teeth on C back in the days of K&R when unix wasn't kewl, so I'm aware of the portability issues, or the lack thereof I should say. I feel that we need a platform independent way of implementing cipe, and I only use the term proxy in the literal sense. Maybe I should term it 'proxy routing'. I admit I haven't read every line of cipe code, time doesn't permit me such luxuries anymore, so I have to make the assumption that such an implementation would link into the network protocol stacks a different way than creating a cipe adapter and I don't even know if there is a way to create a virtual adapter with java, or other more portable languages. So if you will indulge me, I'll re-state my question this way; Is a portable language version feasible, and if so how might the bindings to an 'network adapter' take place? Thank you, ---russ Russell Berry Berrex Computer Solutions http://www.berrex.com Russ,AT,berrex,DOT,com 1-877-558-9507 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Damion Wilson" <dwilson,AT,ibl,DOT,bm> To: "Russell Berry" <russ,AT,berrex,DOT,com> Cc: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:13 PM Subject: Re: java > There's only the one implementation and I'm acutely aware of the problems as I > keep and have reviewed each of the pertinent emails. However, I'm not aware > of the problems you perceive and am not particularly clear as to how they > could be solved by Java or a proxy (?). > > My question was not to find out what's on the mailing list, it was to find out > what YOU consider to be problematic, in an effort to make the software > better, or to simply help you out. This is the way of Free/Open Source > Software. > > Since you're averse to questions, I promise not ask you any more of them. > > Damion K. Wilson > > On Thursday 26 June 2003 06:55 pm, you wrote: > > Well, I've been following this list for a number of years now, I've seen > > extensive messages about problems with windows implementations. I know > > you've seen the same posts I have, so how about not answering a question > > with a question and just address the message I posted? > > > > ---russ > > > > Russell Berry > > Berrex Computer Solutions > > http://www.berrex.com > > Russ,AT,berrex,DOT,com > > 1-877-558-9507 > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Damion Wilson" <dwilson,AT,ibl,DOT,bm> > > To: "Russell Berry" <russ,AT,berrex,DOT,com> > > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:25 PM > > Subject: Re: java > > > > > What kinds of obstacles ? > > > > > > DKW > > > > > > On Thursday 26 June 2003 11:54 am, Russell Berry wrote: > > > > I was wondering if anyone has contemplated a java/proxy version of > > > > cipe. > > > > I > > > > > > think it may overcome many obstacles faced by MS Windows users. > > > > > > > > ---russ > > > > > > > > Russell Berry > > > > Berrex Computer Solutions > > > > http://www.berrex.com > > > > Russ,AT,berrex,DOT,com > > > > 1-877-558-9507 > > > -- > Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list. > Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body > Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address. > CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>