<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: "Renato Salles" <rsalles,AT,rsnetservices,DOT,com,DOT,br>
Subject: Re: Redhat9 CIPE
From: "Naoki" <i_naoki,AT,mbf,DOT,nifty,DOT,com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:11:40 +0900
Cc: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307231918330.7034-100000@libra.rsnetservices.com.br>

Dear Renato,

 Thank you very much for your advice.

 I'll try it right now.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Renato Salles" <rsalles,AT,rsnetservices,DOT,com,DOT,br>
To: "Naoki" <i_naoki,AT,mbf,DOT,nifty,DOT,com>
Cc: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: Redhat9 CIPE

> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Naoki wrote:
>
> Yes, my experience says that you really need a wins server to bypass the
> limitations that name resolution in win32 is supposed to do with NetBEUI
> (not routable, BTW). With it, you'll be able to "browse" the hole
> domain/workgroup.
>
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >  Finally, I could build CIPE VPN as below.
> >
> > 192.168.0.0/24                                    192.168.10.0/24
> > LAN1----------GW1========GW2------------LAN2
> >
> >  There is a WindowsPC on each LAN.
> > These PCs could transfer the file each other.I could cfm by ethereal.
> >
> >  But all WindowsPC can see only by IP address.
> >
> >  Do I need WINS server ?
> > Or, Are there any ways to see PC name ?
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Naoki" <i_naoki,AT,mbf,DOT,nifty,DOT,com>
> > To: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 1:42 AM
> > Subject: Redhat9 CIPE
> >
> >
> > > Hello !
> > >
> > >  I am trying to build CIPE VPN network on
> > > my Firewall with Redhat9 now.
> > >
> > >  It seems that GUI tools made an original config
> > > file into /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-cipcb0.
> > >
> > >  In Redhat9 security-manual and Web information,
> > > the config file is /etc/cipe/options.cipcb0.
> > >
> > >  It make me too confuse.
> > >
> > >
> > > <Case1>
> > >  LAN1==Firewall-A==Internet==Firewall-B=LAN2
> > > <Case2>
> > >  LAN1==Firewall-C==Internet==Dial-up Client
> > >
> > >  I guess, the config on Firewall-C can use for B and C.
> > > Because, Even if Firewall-B is using Dynamic DNS,
> > > Firewall-A can receive UDP packet such like C.
> > >
> > >  Using NAT, (in Redhat security-manual),
> > > (iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.0/24 -o eth0 -j
MASQUERADE)
> > > Can this filter prevent to forward NetBIOS to internet by the other
> > iptables
> > > ?
> > > If there is....
> > > iptables -A FORWARD -o eth0 -p tcp --sport 137:139 -j DROP
> > > Can CIPE work correctly ?
> > >
> > > Please advise !
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
> > > Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
> > > Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
> > > CIPE info and list archive:
> > <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
> > Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
> > Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
> > CIPE info and list archive:
<URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>
> >
>
>


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]