| To: | "Renato Salles" <rsalles,AT,rsnetservices,DOT,com,DOT,br> |
| Subject: | Re: Redhat9 CIPE |
| From: | "Naoki" <i_naoki,AT,mbf,DOT,nifty,DOT,com> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:11:40 +0900 |
| Cc: | <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307231918330.7034-100000@libra.rsnetservices.com.br> |
Dear Renato, Thank you very much for your advice. I'll try it right now. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Renato Salles" <rsalles,AT,rsnetservices,DOT,com,DOT,br> To: "Naoki" <i_naoki,AT,mbf,DOT,nifty,DOT,com> Cc: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 7:21 AM Subject: Re: Redhat9 CIPE > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Naoki wrote: > > Yes, my experience says that you really need a wins server to bypass the > limitations that name resolution in win32 is supposed to do with NetBEUI > (not routable, BTW). With it, you'll be able to "browse" the hole > domain/workgroup. > > > > > Hi, > > > > Finally, I could build CIPE VPN as below. > > > > 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.10.0/24 > > LAN1----------GW1========GW2------------LAN2 > > > > There is a WindowsPC on each LAN. > > These PCs could transfer the file each other.I could cfm by ethereal. > > > > But all WindowsPC can see only by IP address. > > > > Do I need WINS server ? > > Or, Are there any ways to see PC name ? > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Naoki" <i_naoki,AT,mbf,DOT,nifty,DOT,com> > > To: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de> > > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 1:42 AM > > Subject: Redhat9 CIPE > > > > > > > Hello ! > > > > > > I am trying to build CIPE VPN network on > > > my Firewall with Redhat9 now. > > > > > > It seems that GUI tools made an original config > > > file into /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-cipcb0. > > > > > > In Redhat9 security-manual and Web information, > > > the config file is /etc/cipe/options.cipcb0. > > > > > > It make me too confuse. > > > > > > > > > <Case1> > > > LAN1==Firewall-A==Internet==Firewall-B=LAN2 > > > <Case2> > > > LAN1==Firewall-C==Internet==Dial-up Client > > > > > > I guess, the config on Firewall-C can use for B and C. > > > Because, Even if Firewall-B is using Dynamic DNS, > > > Firewall-A can receive UDP packet such like C. > > > > > > Using NAT, (in Redhat security-manual), > > > (iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE) > > > Can this filter prevent to forward NetBIOS to internet by the other > > iptables > > > ? > > > If there is.... > > > iptables -A FORWARD -o eth0 -p tcp --sport 137:139 -j DROP > > > Can CIPE work correctly ? > > > > > > Please advise ! > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list. > > > Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body > > > Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address. > > > CIPE info and list archive: > > <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html> > > > > > > > > > -- > > Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list. > > Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body > > Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address. > > CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html> > > > >