Re: Redhat9 CIPE|
Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:38:00 +0900|
By the way,
Are there any ways to see NetBIOS name without wins server ?
Though I knew the necessity of wins server standardly, I expect
that I can see NetBIOS name without wins server.
I guess, if iptables accepts port 137:139 for CIPE, I can see it.
How is my guess ?
In this situation, I must build a Firewall system with VPN for business.
If I build Samba into this system, security will not be good. Besides,
there are not any other PC which can build Samba any longer.
(And, if ClientPC is not on LAN(Ex.dial-up), there is not wins server.)
Though I tryed to use lmhosts in WindowsPC on LAN2, I could not
see the another side NetBIOS name on LAN1 directly.
After search this NetBIOS name, I could find it.
Anyway, I really worry now. Since CIPE is faster than IPsec and is
useful for NAT, I'd like to use CIPE very much.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Naoki" <i_naoki,AT,mbf,DOT,nifty,DOT,com>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: Redhat9 CIPE
> Finally, I could build CIPE VPN as below.
> 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.10.0/24
> There is a WindowsPC on each LAN.
> These PCs could transfer the file each other.I could cfm by ethereal.
> But all WindowsPC can see only by IP address.
> Do I need WINS server ?
> Or, Are there any ways to see PC name ?