<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Subject: Re: Redhat9 CIPE
From: "Naoki" <i_naoki,AT,mbf,DOT,nifty,DOT,com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 01:21:25 +0900

Maybe,

 I found the reason just now.

 CIPE cannot treat UDP(port137:139) packet for encapsulation.

 Is that correct ?

 If correct, I must build Samba in Firewall system......

 Are not there is a good idea ?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Naoki" <i_naoki,AT,mbf,DOT,nifty,DOT,com>
To: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 12:38 AM
Subject: Re: Redhat9 CIPE

> By the way,
> 
>  Are there any ways to see NetBIOS name without wins server ?
> 
>  Though I knew the necessity of wins server standardly, I expect
> that I can see NetBIOS name without wins server.
> 
>  I guess, if iptables accepts port 137:139 for CIPE, I can see it.
> 
>  How is my guess ?


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]