<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Subject: Re: Slow file sharing performance
From: "Hans Steegers" <hsx,AT,dds,DOT,nl>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 15:09:53 +0200
Reply-to: "Hans Steegers" <steegers,AT,steegers,DOT,nl>

>Cipe uses UDP protocol and it is very sensitive to packet latency and
>packet loss. So I think UDP does not suite for a VPN, where files must be
>transported. Try SSH tunnels instead.

This is BS!

Hans Steegers

-----Original Message-----
From: Tanel <tanel,AT,kivilinn,DOT,tartu,DOT,ee>
To: James Knott <james.knott,AT,rogers,DOT,com>
Cc: CIPE <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Date: Sunday, August 31, 2003 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: Slow file sharing performance

>On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, James Knott wrote:
>
>> >> I've notice that while my CIPE VPN works, that SMB and NFS access of
>> >> my home network from my notebook is slow.  However, going the other
>>
>> One computer is a 1.113 GHz PIII, the other is an Athlon XP 1700.  I'd
>> suspect both ends have sufficient horsepower.  Also, when watching the
>> data lights flash, it's apparent that the data transfer stops entirely
>> for quite a while.  I would expect transfers to be slower due to the
>
>Cipe uses UDP protocol and it is very sensitive to packet latency and
>packet loss. So I think UDP does not suite for a VPN, where files must be
>transported. Try SSH tunnels instead.
>
>
>--
>Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
>Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
>Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
>CIPE info and list archive:
<URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]