Archive for cipe-l, 2003-09 (by date)

• September 30, 2003
  • Re: New mailing lists, Olaf Titz
  • Re: New mailing lists, Christof Meerwald
  • Re: Relevant information, hans steegers
  • Re: New mailing lists, Ganesh Sittampalam
  • Re: Simple steps to improve CIPE security, Allan Latham
  • Re: Simple steps to improve CIPE security, Wolfgang Walter
  • RE: Simple steps to improve CIPE security, Тарасов Андрей Андреевич
  • Re: Simple steps to improve CIPE security, Allan Latham
  • Re: Simple steps to improve CIPE security, Eric M. Hopper
  • RE: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessit yor benefit of a larger checksum., Тарасов Андрей Андреевич
  • Re: new devellopers, Allan Latham
  • Simple steps to improve CIPE security, Allan Latham
  • RE: New mailing lists, Eric M. Hopper
  • RE: New mailing lists, Mark Smith
  • CRC is encrypted, Hans Steegers
  • RE: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Тарасов Андрей Андреевич
  • cipe without KLM support?, Bostjan Skufca (at) domenca.si
• September 30, 2003
  • Re: New mailing lists, Christoph Biedl
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., jon+cipe
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityorbenefit of a larger checksum., James Knott
  • Re: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, Wolfgang Walter
  • Re: New mailing lists, Eric M. Hopper
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me thenecessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Eric M. Hopper
  • New mailing lists, Olaf Titz
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessity or benefit of a larger checksum., hans steegers
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., hans steegers
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me thenecessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Eric M. Hopper
  • RE: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me thenecessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Eric M. Hopper
  • RE: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me thenecessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Eric M. Hopper
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me thenecessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Eric M. Hopper
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me thenecessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Eric M. Hopper
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Hans Steegers
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Hans Steegers
  • RE: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Mark Smith
  • RE: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Тарасов Андрей Андреевич
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Hans Steegers
  • HMAC using a static key is a bad idea?, Hans Steegers
  • RE: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Mark Smith
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., jon+cipe
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Hans Steegers
  • RE: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Тарасов Андрей Андреевич
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Hans Steegers
  • RE: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Mark Smith
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Hans Steegers
  • Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityor benefit of a larger checksum., Eric M. Hopper
• September 29, 2003
  • Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessity or benefit of a larger checksum., Hans Steegers
  • Relevant information, Hans Steegers
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Olaf Titz
  • Re: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, Olaf Titz
• September 27, 2003
  • new devellopers (was Re: About P.Gutmann's critique of CIPE - etc. etc., jon+cipe
  • Re: CRC-32 and CipeX, Eric M. Hopper
  • CRC-32 and CipeX, Hans Steegers
  • RE: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Joseph Jamieson
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Chaos Eternal
• September 27, 2003
  • RE: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Joseph Jamieson
  • Re: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, R. Steve McKown
  • Re: About P.Gutmann's critique of CIPE - etc. etc., R. Steve McKown
  • RE: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, rsalles
  • Re: About P.Gutmann's critique of CIPE - etc. etc., Les Mikesell
  • Re: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, James Yonan
  • Re: About P.Gutmann's critique of CIPE - etc. etc., James Yonan
  • Re: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, James Yonan
  • RE: difference between using a library or a part of the kernel?, David Brodbeck
  • Re: difference between using a library or a part of the kernel?, hans steegers
  • RE: About P.Gutmann's critique of CIPE - etc. etc., Les Mikesell
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, R. Steve McKown
  • RE: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, James Yonan
  • RE: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Dick St.Peters
  • Re: List structure, R. Steve McKown
  • Re: About P.Gutmann's critique of CIPE - etc. etc., R. Steve McKown
  • Re: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, Christoph Biedl
  • RE: List structure, Mark Smith
  • Re: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, Allan Latham
  • Re: About P.Gutmann's critique of CIPE - etc. etc., rsalles
  • Re: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, R. Steve McKown
  • RE: Viruses, Mark Smith
  • RE: About P.Gutmann's critique of CIPE - etc. etc., David Brodbeck
  • RE: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, David Brodbeck
  • WG: List structure, Lewandowski Georg
  • RE: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Renato Salles
  • Re: About P.Gutmann's critique of CIPE - etc. etc., Allan Latham
  • Re: List structure, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: About P.Gutmann's critique of CIPE - etc. etc., Jake Appelbaum
  • Re: About P.Gutmann's critique of CIPE - etc. etc., Les Mikesell
  • Re: List structure, Eric M. Hopper
  • Re: About P.Gutmann's critique of CIPE - etc. etc., Hans Steegers
  • Re: List structure, Allan Latham
  • List structure, Mark Smith
  • Replays - thoughts on Gutmann response, Allan Latham
  • Re: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, Allan Latham
  • Re: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, Eric M. Hopper
  • RE: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Eric M. Hopper
  • RE: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Joseph Jamieson
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Ori Pessach
  • Re: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, James Yonan
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdotand the response by the CIPE list, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, R. Steve McKown
  • CIPE Critique - a little encouragement..., Phil Scarratt
• September 26, 2003
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Damion Wilson
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Damion Wilson
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Damion Wilson
  • Re: My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdot and the response by the CIPE list, Damion Wilson
  • Re: About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, R. Steve McKown
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, R. Steve McKown
  • About Peter Gutmann's critique of CIPE, Olaf Titz
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Ori Pessach
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, R. Steve McKown
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Eric M. Hopper
  • Remove cipe adapter error in WINNT: CIPE Version 2.0-pre15, Michael Tran
  • RE: My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdotand the response by the CIPE list, Les Mikesell
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Harald Koch
  • can't bind to port, win2k, Walter van Berkel
  • RE: My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdot and the response by the CIPE list, David Brodbeck
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Allan Latham
  • Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Eric M. Hopper
  • Padding - thoughts on Gutmann response, Allan Latham
  • Re: My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdotand the response by the CIPE list, Jake Appelbaum
  • CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response, Allan Latham
  • Re: My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdot and the response by the CIPE list, Damion Wilson
  • Re: My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdotand the response by the CIPE list, Eric M. Hopper
  • Re: Long message - thoughts on Gutmann response, Eric M. Hopper
  • My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdot andthe response by the CIPE list, Jake Appelbaum
  • Peter Gutmann: Coda to "Linux's answer to MS-PPTP", Hans Steegers
  • Re: Long message - thoughts on Gutmann response, Dave Howe
  • Re: Long message - thoughts on Gutmann response, Allan Latham
• September 24, 2003
  • RE: Long message - thoughts on Gutmann response, Dick St.Peters
  • Re: Long message - thoughts on Gutmann response, Christof Meerwald
  • RE: Long message - thoughts on Gutmann response, David Brodbeck
  • Was: What do you guys think about this? Is: Olaf, are you there?, rsalles
  • Re: Long message - thoughts on Gutmann response, Gert
  • Re: Windows NT 4.0 take time (lots of), Damion Wilson
  • Long message - thoughts on Gutmann response, R. Steve McKown
  • Windows NT 4.0 take time (lots of), Bostjan Skufca (at) domenca.si
  • Re: Peter Gutmann + Slashdot, Les Mikesell
  • Re: Peter Gutmann + Slashdot, Damion Wilson
  • Re: Peter Gutmann + Slashdot, Guus Sliepen
  • test mail, Chaos Eternal
  • Re: CIPE RH linux + Windows 2000 routing problem - It is working:-)), Micha Nelissen
  • Re: CIPE RH linux + Windows 2000 routing problem - It is working :-)), Zkoumalek
  • RE: What do you guys think about this?, Mark Smith
  • Re: Peter Gutmann + Slashdot, Jon Bendtsen
  • Re: CIPE RH linux + Windows 2000 routing problem - It is working:-)), Micha Nelissen
  • Re: CIPE RH linux + Windows 2000 routing problem - It is working :-)), Zkoumalek
  • Re: Discussion of Cipe on /., Hans Steegers
  • Re: CIPE RH linux + Windows 2000 routing problem - It is working:-)), Micha Nelissen
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Allan Latham
  • Re: Peter Gutmann + Slashdot, Phil Scarratt
• September 24, 2003
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Russell Berry
  • RE: What do you guys think about this?, Rod Boyce
  • RE: Peter Gutmann + Slashdot, Mark Smith
  • Peter Gutmann + Slashdot, Damion Wilson
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Damion Wilson
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Dave Howe
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Dick St.Peters
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Damion Wilson
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Damion Wilson
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Hans Steegers
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Phil Scarratt
  • RE: CIPE RH linux + Windows 2000 routing problem - It is working :-)), Zkoumalek
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, rsalles
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Mr Allwyn Fernandes
  • RE: What do you guys think about this?, Rod Boyce
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Mailing Lists
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Russell Berry
  • Re: What do you guys think about this?, Damion Wilson
  • What do you guys think about this?, Groups
• September 23, 2003
  • Re: TOT: Am i subscribed?, Christoph Biedl
  • TOT: Am i subscribed?, rsalles
• September 19, 2003
  • Re: CIPE RH linux + Windows 2000 routing problem, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: CIPE RH linux + Windows 2000 routing problem, Hans Steegers
  • Re: CIPE RH linux + Windows 2000 routing problem, Phil Scarratt
  • CIPE RH linux + Windows 2000 routing problem, Zkoumalek
  • DDK, news_cipe
• September 19, 2003
  • Re: w2k cipe problem again, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: w2k cipe problem again, Renato Salles
  • w2k cipe problem again, Manner, Jorma
  • Re: kxchg: Operation not permitted, Berend Veldkamp
  • Problems with cipe in w2k, Manner, Jorma
  • Enable/Disable WIN32 CIPE Adapter, Phil Scarratt
  • Hardware ID of CIPE-WIN32 adapter, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: kxchg: Operation not permitted, Allan Latham
• September 17, 2003
  • Re: kxchg: Operation not permitted, Hans Steegers
  • cipe tunnel between 2 dyn ip hosts, Gyorsok Istvan
  • cipe tunnel between 2 dyn ip hosts, Gyorsok Istvan
  • Re: CPU Usage CIPE-WIN32 Windows XP, bhein
  • Re: kxchg: Operation not permitted, Berend Veldkamp
  • Re: CPU Usage CIPE-WIN32 Windows XP, hans steegers
  • RE: site to site VPN, Michael Da Cova
  • RE: CPU Usage CIPE-WIN32 Windows XP, Mark Smith
  • Windows XP DDK, news_cipe
  • Re: CPU Usage CIPE-WIN32 Windows XP, bhein
  • RE: site to site VPN, Mark Smith
  • Problem with CIPE between Windows XP and Linux, Mariusz Drozdziel
  • Re: site to site VPN, bhein
  • Re: Accessing LAN from XP -- Dealing with Windows clients ..., Renato Salles
  • Re: CPU Usage CIPE-WIN32 Windows XP, Damion Wilson
  • Re: site to site VPN, Damion Wilson
  • Re: Accessing LAN from XP -- Dealing with Windows clients ..., Perl
  • Re: kxchg: Operation not permitted, Hans Steegers
  • Re: Re: Cannot setup >1 cipe interfaces, Perl
• September 16, 2003
  • Re: CPU Usage CIPE-WIN32 Windows XP, Renato Salles
  • Re: CPU Usage CIPE-WIN32 Windows XP, bhein
  • RES: Cannot setup >1 cipe interfaces, Leonardo Larsen Rocha
  • Re: Cannot setup >1 cipe interfaces, Renato Salles
  • Re: CPU Usage CIPE-WIN32 Windows XP, Renato Salles
  • Re: Cannot setup >1 cipe interfaces, Russell Berry
  • Cannot setup >1 cipe interfaces, Perl
  • Re: kxchg: Operation not permitted, Berend Veldkamp
  • kxchg: Operation not permitted, Berend Veldkamp
  • Re: CPU Usage CIPE-WIN32 Windows XP, bhein
  • CIPE <-> 802.11x INTEGRATION, Enrique Arizón Benito
  • RE: CPU Usage CIPE-WIN32 Windows XP, Mark Smith
• September 16, 2003
  • Re: CPU Usage CIPE-WIN32 Windows XP, Renato Salles
  • CPU Usage CIPE-WIN32 Windows XP, bhein
  • Re: site to site VPN, bhein
  • Re: site to site VPN, Renato Salles
  • Re: site to site VPN, bhein
  • Re: site to site vpn, hans steegers
  • Re: site to site vpn, Russell Berry
  • site to site vpn, Keith Fernandez
  • Accessing LAN from XP, Perl
• September 14, 2003
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance - summary, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance - summary, Les Mikesell
• September 13, 2003
  • Slow file sharing performance - summary, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Hans Steegers
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Allan Latham
  • Re: CIPE-Win32 question, Damion Wilson
• September 12, 2003
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: tcpdump - laptop], James Knott
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: tcpdump - laptop], James Knott
  • Re: tcpdump - laptop -2-, James Knott
  • Re: tcpdump - laptop -2-, Hans Steegers
  • Re: PMTU problems with IP-over-IP tunneling - a summary, Dick St.Peters
  • [Fwd: Re: tcpdump - laptop], Renato Salles
  • Re: tcpdump - laptop, James Knott
  • Re: tcpdump - laptop, Hans Steegers
  • Windows XP to RH9 can't browse network, Perl
  • Re: tcpdump - laptop, James Knott
  • Re: tcpdump - laptop, James Knott
• September 11, 2003
  • Re: trouble building cipe on debian / sarge, Stefan Marx
  • Re: tcpdump - laptop, Hans Steegers
  • RE: Missing messages, Mark Smith
  • Re: Missing messages, James Knott
  • tcpdump - server_eth0 IP 192.168.1.10, James Knott
  • tcpdump - router_eth1 IP 192.168.1.40 (local lan side), James Knott
  • tcpdump - router_eth0 IP 24.42.142.216 (Internet side), James Knott
  • tcpdump - router cipcb0 IP 192.168.2.10, James Knott
  • tcpdump - laptop_ppp0 IP 209.188.81.170, James Knott
  • tcpdump - laptop_cipb0 IP 192.168.2.20, James Knott
  • Re: Missing messages, James Knott
  • Re: Missing messages, Hans Steegers
  • Re: Make CIPE Persistant, Renato A. Q. Salles
  • Re: Make CIPE Persistant, Hans Steegers
  • Re: Make CIPE Persistant, Cegonha
  • Re: Make CIPE Persistant, Hans Steegers
  • RE: Make CIPE Persistent, Mark Smith
  • Make CIPE Persistant, Cegonha
  • Missing messages, James Knott
  • PMTU problems with IP-over-IP tunneling - a summary, Hans Steegers
  • RE: trouble building cipe on debian / sarge, Mark Smith
  • Re: trouble building cipe on debian / sarge, Hans Steegers
  • trouble building cipe on debian / sarge, Stefan Marx
• September 10, 2003
  • Re: Lots of recv/sendmsg, Hans Steegers
  • Lots of recv/sendmsg, Micha Nelissen
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
• September 09, 2003
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance: lostpidgeons"), James Knott
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharingperformance: lostpidgeons"), Les Mikesell
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance: lostpidgeons"), James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: CIPE behind Linksys routers..., James Knott
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance: lostpidgeons"), James Knott
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance:lostpidgeons"), Les Mikesell
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance: lostpidgeons"), James Knott
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance: lostpidgeons"), James Knott
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance: lostpidgeons"), James Knott
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance: lostpidgeons"), Peter van den Heuvel
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance: lostpidgeons"), Peter van den Heuvel
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance: lostpidgeons"), Hans Steegers
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance: lostpidgeons"), Tanel
• September 09, 2003
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance: lostpidgeons"), James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance: pidgeons lost!, James Knott
  • Re: Automatic ruleset generation with CIPE, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Renato A. Q. Salles
  • Re: Checklist (sub-thread of: "Slow file sharing performance: lost pidgeons"), Hans Steegers
  • Re: Automatic ruleset generation with CIPE, Hans Steegers
  • Automatic ruleset generation with CIPE, Jan Frederik Pielhau
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance: pidgeons lost!, Allan Latham
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance: pidgeons lost!, Hans Steegers
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance: pidgeons lost!, Allan Latham
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance: pidgeons lost!, Hans Steegers
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Allan Latham
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Allan Latham
• September 07, 2003
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Peter van den Heuvel
  • Re: cipe linux problems, Hans Steegers
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
• September 06, 2003
  • Re: CIPE on linux 2.6, Micha Nelissen
• September 05, 2003
  • Re: CIPE on linux 2.6, Hans Steegers
  • CIPE on linux 2.6, Micha Nelissen
  • Re: cipe kills our wireless link, Dragan Matic
  • Win2K SP4 crash on 4-way SMP system, James Yonan
• September 04, 2003
  • Re: kxchg error, Matthew Galgoci
  • Re: cipe kills our wireless link, Hans Steegers
  • cipe kills our wireless link, Dragan Matic
• September 03, 2003
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Allan Latham
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: Mini-distro, Tomasz Ciolek
  • Mini-distro, Renato A. Q. Salles
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Hans Steegers
• September 03, 2003
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Jake Bullet
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Hans Steegers
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Jake Bullet
  • Re: pkcipe problem "frame error" - RESUBMITTED, Gernot W. Schmied
  • Re: A stupid question about keepalive pings, Hans Steegers
  • A stupid question about keepalive pings, Dragan Matic
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Allan Latham
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Jake Bullet
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Jake Bullet
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Jake Bullet
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Jake Bullet
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Jake Bullet
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Jake Bullet
• September 02, 2003
  • Re: Win2k and CIPE, Sven Bröckling
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Carsten Emde
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Win2k and CIPE, David A. Osborn
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Allan Latham
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Hans Steegers
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Peter van den Heuvel
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, Hans Steegers
  • Re: Details, vladimir.michl
  • Re: Thank you!, erikw
  • Re: CIPE works, but there is routing problem I can't solve, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: kxchg error, Phil Scarratt
  • Re: Slow file sharing performance, James Knott
• September 01, 2003
  • Gert Vandelaer/Medisearch is out of the office., Gert . Vandelaer