| To: | Phil Scarratt <fil,AT,draxsen,DOT,com> |
| Subject: | Re: Win2k and CIPE |
| From: | Jake Bullet <jbullet,AT,cats,DOT,meow,DOT,at> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Sep 2003 03:22:05 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de |
| In-reply-to: | <3F53FBAA.4010402@draxsen.com> |
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Phil Scarratt wrote: > Jake Bullet wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, David A. Osborn wrote: > > > <SNIP> > > > > p.p.s. I've been trying to get the Linux box at the other end of mine to > > route packets, and to get the Windows2k box to route packets for the > > subnet down the link in the first place. If you find the solution, please > > post it :-) > > > What exactly do you mean by this. If the Linux box or WinBox are default > gateways for their respective networks then it should happen > automatically. You will need a route to the remote NETWORK (not just the > remote machine) which needs adding manually, in either the Linux or > Win case. > Win2k(Alice) Linux(Bob) Win2k(Chris) 172.16.0.2 172.16.0.1 - 172.16.1.1 172.16.1.2 I'd like the two client machines (alice & chris) to share a private network through the server (Bob) over CIPE. The only way I could think of was to give each machine its own subnet and have Bob route between them. I tried this for ages, but I could never get the Win2k clients to route the 172.16.0.0 network down the interface. If I added specific routes then it sent the packets (from Alice to Bob) but then Bob failed to forward them. Stephen