<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: Phil Scarratt <fil,AT,draxsen,DOT,com>
Subject: Re: Win2k and CIPE
From: Jake Bullet <jbullet,AT,cats,DOT,meow,DOT,at>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 06:15:52 +0100 (BST)
Cc: cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de
In-reply-to: <3F54270F.1080503@draxsen.com>

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Phil Scarratt wrote:

> Jake Bullet wrote:
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>That's not quiet it, as Chris is also running CIPE to Bob.  I did try 
> >>>this
> >>>but the Server (Bob) didn't seem to be routing the packets.
> >>>I did turn on IP forwarding.  Running TCP dump on both CIPE interfaces
> >>>showed Alice sending the ECHO REQUEST to Bob, and that's where it 
> >>>stopped.
> >>>
> >>>As mentioned lots of these were showing up in the syslog:
> >>>
> >>>May  6 01:21:37 bob kernel: cipcb2: got bogus length=9
> >>>May  6 01:21:37 bob kernel: cipcb1: got bogus length=9
> >>>
> >>>Stephen
> >>>
> >>
> >>Is there a firewall running on Bob? What's the routing table for Bob 
> >>look like?
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > There is no firewall running on Bob for the CIPE interfaces, and the
> > routing table is empty.
> > 
> > Stephen
> > 
> Empty routing table?? That's gotta be why then...Bob has got no idea 
> where to pass anything. There should at least be interface lo listed 
> surely......I've forgotten what distro you're running on Bob....
> 
> Bob needs to have routes to 172.16.0.2 and 172.16.1.2 (or their networks 
> if other computers are needed to be accessed via the CIPE tunnel).
> 

What do I need to add?

I was planning on having a whole big system of Win2k clients, all on
different subnets.  Will I need a massive routing table to get them all
talking to each other?

Stephen


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]