<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: Phil Scarratt <fil,AT,draxsen,DOT,com>
Subject: Re: Win2k and CIPE
From: Jake Bullet <jbullet,AT,cats,DOT,meow,DOT,at>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 06:41:15 +0100 (BST)
Cc: cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de
In-reply-to: <3F542A08.3030708@draxsen.com>

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Phil Scarratt wrote:
[snip]
> > 
> > What do I need to add?
> > 
> > I was planning on having a whole big system of Win2k clients, all on
> > different subnets.  Will I need a massive routing table to get them all
> > talking to each other?
> > 
> > Stephen
> > 
> 
> I'm a little confused here, as when cipe starts successfully on linux, 
> routes are automatically added for the other end of the tunnel. In other 
> words, starting cipcb0 (whose ip is 172.16.0.1 and peer is 172.16.0.2) 
> should add at least the following to the route table:
> 
> 172.16.0.2  *  255.255.255.255 U 0 0 0 cipcb0
> 
> If these are not appearing then something strange is going on - are you 
> sure the tunnel is starting correctly??
> 

Okay, what I should have said was "I've not added anything to the routing
table" rather than saying it was empty.

With alice(cipcb0) and chris's(cipcb1) interface enabled it looks like
this:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination   Gateway        Genmask         Flags Metric Ref  Use  Iface
172.16.0.2    *              255.255.255.255 UH    0      0      0  cipcb0
172.16.1.2    *              255.255.255.255 UH    0      0      0  cipcb1
192.168.200.0 *              255.255.255.192 U     0      0      0  eth0
default       192.168.200.62 0.0.0.0         UG    0      0      0  eth0


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]