Phil Scarratt <fil,AT,draxsen,DOT,com>|
Re: Win2k and CIPE|
Jake Bullet <jbullet,AT,cats,DOT,meow,DOT,at>|
Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:31:24 +0100 (BST)|
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Phil Scarratt wrote:
> Jake Bullet wrote:
> > Okay, what I should have said was "I've not added anything to the routing
> > table" rather than saying it was empty.
> > With alice(cipcb0) and chris's(cipcb1) interface enabled it looks like
> > this:
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> > 172.16.0.2 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 cipcb0
> > 172.16.1.2 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 cipcb1
> > 192.168.200.0 * 255.255.255.192 U 0 0 0 eth0
> > default 192.168.200.62 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
> OK...that makes more sense now.....
> Let's recap a few things:
> 1. Can Alice ping Bob and vice-versa?
> 2. Can Chris ping Bob and vice-versa?
> 3. Adding a route to 172.16.1.0 on Alice and pinging Chris doesn't work
> 4. What is the default route on Chris? Chris needs to know how to get to
> 172.16.0.0 specifically if it's default route is NOT Bob.
The default route is to 0.0.0.0 through his local gateway 192.168.250.190
I've tried adding routes for 172.16.0.0/255.255.0.0 and the win2k client
seems to fail to route packets for 172.16.0.0 down it.