<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: Phil Scarratt <fil,AT,draxsen,DOT,com>
Subject: Re: Win2k and CIPE
From: Jake Bullet <jbullet,AT,cats,DOT,meow,DOT,at>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:31:24 +0100 (BST)
Cc: cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de
In-reply-to: <3F54335D.7090906@draxsen.com>

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Phil Scarratt wrote:

> Jake Bullet wrote:
> > Okay, what I should have said was "I've not added anything to the routing
> > table" rather than saying it was empty.
> > 
> > With alice(cipcb0) and chris's(cipcb1) interface enabled it looks like
> > this:
> > 
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination   Gateway        Genmask         Flags Metric Ref  Use  Iface
> > 172.16.0.2    *              255.255.255.255 UH    0      0      0  cipcb0
> > 172.16.1.2    *              255.255.255.255 UH    0      0      0  cipcb1
> > 192.168.200.0 *              255.255.255.192 U     0      0      0  eth0
> > default       192.168.200.62 0.0.0.0         UG    0      0      0  eth0
> > 
> 
> OK...that makes more sense now.....
> Let's recap a few things:
> 1. Can Alice ping Bob and vice-versa?
Yes.
> 2. Can Chris ping Bob and vice-versa?
Yes.
> 3. Adding a route to 172.16.1.0 on Alice and pinging Chris doesn't work
Correct.
> 4. What is the default route on Chris? Chris needs to know how to get to 
> 172.16.0.0 specifically if it's default route is NOT Bob.
 
The default route is to 0.0.0.0 through his local gateway 192.168.250.190

I've tried adding routes for 172.16.0.0/255.255.0.0 and the win2k client
seems to fail to route packets for 172.16.0.0 down it.

Stephen


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]