<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: Hans Steegers <steegers,AT,steegers,DOT,nl>
Subject: Re: Win2k and CIPE
From: Jake Bullet <jbullet,AT,cats,DOT,meow,DOT,at>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 23:27:51 +0100 (BST)
Cc: cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de
In-reply-to: <001101c37193$83c28380$d620a8c0@pcw_hans.hnsasd.priv>

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Hans Steegers wrote:

> Jake,
> 
> >I've tried adding routes for 172.16.0.0/255.255.0.0 and the win2k client
> >seems to fail to route packets for 172.16.0.0 down it.
> 
> Shouldn't that be 172.16.0.0/255.255._255_.0 for cibcb0 !?
> 
> A mask of 255.255.0.0 includes both 172.16.0.2 AND  172.16.1.2, so it is
> difficult to know to which interface to send the packets..
> 
> Hans Steegers
> 

No this is on the client(s) not the server.  If you lie about the size of
the subnet on the client end it should send all packets to the server
which then worries about which subnet they should be going to.

Stephen


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]