| To: | CIPE <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de> |
| Subject: | Re: Slow file sharing performance |
| From: | Allan Latham <alatham,AT,flexsys-group,DOT,com> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:51:51 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <3F5A8FD8.9070207@rogers.com> |
| References: | <3F515FDA.5080406@rogers.com> <200309040929.00895.alatham@flexsys-group.com> <3F5A8FD8.9070207@rogers.com> |
Hi James the problem is that the laptop is sending the icmp for port unreachable on the smb dgram port - or better said I am concerned that this is the last thing we see before all activity stops. Set up the normal configuration i.e over dial up and cipe. Confirm with "netstat -antup" that you have the samba listening on all the ports it should - particularly the udp dgram port (138). Confirm that you are not blocking this port with "iptables -L -v -n" Is there anything in the samba configuration which restricts connectivity to/from specific hosts/nets? The direct connection test means that a lot of samba must be working - the main differences (beside speed) are the use of eth0 on the laptop rather than ppp0 and cipcb0. The results I saw do not indicate a flood in one direction which does not get through - also the packet sizes are small and this isn't an mtu problem. Best regards Allan On Sunday 07 September 2003 03:54, James Knott wrote: > I have just tried running my vpn through a direct connection via switch > to my firewall, so that it runs at full 100 Mb. I can now access the > file shares with no problem. This would indicate to me that the VPN is > functioning correctly and the problem is likely due to the great > bandwidth difference, as a result of going through the dial up > connection to a 100 Mb network. I wonder what can be done about that? > > tnx jk