Re: Slow file sharing performance|
Allan Latham <alatham,AT,flexsys-group,DOT,com>|
Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:51:51 +0200|
<3F515FDA.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <3F5A8FD8.firstname.lastname@example.org>|
the problem is that the laptop is sending the icmp for port unreachable on
smb dgram port - or better said I am concerned that this is the last thing we
see before all activity stops.
Set up the normal configuration i.e over dial up and cipe.
Confirm with "netstat -antup" that you have the samba listening on all the
ports it should - particularly the udp dgram port (138).
Confirm that you are not blocking this port with "iptables -L -v -n"
Is there anything in the samba configuration which restricts connectivity
to/from specific hosts/nets?
The direct connection test means that a lot of samba must be working - the
main differences (beside speed) are the use of eth0 on the laptop rather than
ppp0 and cipcb0.
The results I saw do not indicate a flood in one direction which does not get
through - also the packet sizes are small and this isn't an mtu problem.
On Sunday 07 September 2003 03:54, James Knott wrote:
> I have just tried running my vpn through a direct connection via switch
> to my firewall, so that it runs at full 100 Mb. I can now access the
> file shares with no problem. This would indicate to me that the VPN is
> functioning correctly and the problem is likely due to the great
> bandwidth difference, as a result of going through the dial up
> connection to a 100 Mb network. I wonder what can be done about that?
> tnx jk