<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Subject: Re: Slow file sharing performance: pidgeons lost!
From: "Hans Steegers" <hsx,AT,dds,DOT,nl>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:19:33 +0200
Reply-to: "Hans Steegers" <steegers,AT,steegers,DOT,nl>

So, his firewall is dropping icmp pidgeons!

Peter was right all along.

Hans Steegers

-----Original Message-----
From: Allan Latham <alatham,AT,flexsys-group,DOT,com>
To: CIPE <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Date: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: Slow file sharing performance

>Hi Peter
>would you like to enighten me on this - I can't see how this applies.
>what happens is that when run over the cipe link there appears to be no
>data transfer. The laptop sends an icmp - port unreachable - for the smb
>dgram port. This does get back to the file server.
>I think this is a samba set up problem but I don't know enough about samba.
>use it - but only on local lans - remote is just too slow fo practical use.
>Best regards
>On Sunday 07 September 2003 11:56, Peter van den Heuvel wrote:
>> > I have just tried running my vpn through a direct connection via switch
>> > to my firewall, so that it runs at full 100 Mb.  I can now access the
>> > file shares with no problem.  This would indicate to me that the VPN is
>> > functioning correctly and the problem is likely due to the great
>> > bandwidth difference, as a result of going through the dial up
>> > connection to a 100 Mb network.  I wonder what can be done about that?
>> I would suggest that you apply RFC 1149
>> Peter
>Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
>Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
>Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
>CIPE info and list archive:

<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]