<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: "CIPE-list" <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Subject: Re: kxchg: Operation not permitted
From: "Hans Steegers" <hsx,AT,dds,DOT,nl>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:32:25 +0200
Reply-to: "Hans Steegers" <steegers,AT,steegers,DOT,nl>


Some answers..

>Yes we're using a static key, so why would pkcipe try to exchange
>dynamic keys?
If you are only using a static key, PKCIPE shouldn't be running at all.

>Besides, the connection is already working (Our remote office is able
>to logon, browse shared drives, ...). Or is dynamic key exchange done
>in another way, do I need to open additional ports?
If you want PKCIPE to communicate with the PKCIPE at the remote peer, you
need to allow tcp traffic between both peers. (See manual).
** However, since you only want to use a static key, you don't need PKCIPE
at all!

>I compiled cipe with the gcc package that's included with the distro,
>RH 7.2, I'm guessing the kernel was compiled with the same version,
>but I'm not sure how to check that.
If you are only using the default 7.2 kernel- and compiler packages, it
should be ok if your source tree was properly configured. Only if cipe
behaves in a unexplainable weird manner, suspect this as a possibility.

>The ip-up.local script we're using is included below, if anyone cares
>to have a look...
Sorry, no time for that: I am not running a free debugging service!

Some remarks..

** ip-up script looks unnecessary complex to me, if not weird.

** Firewall:
For cipe all you need is a hole in the firewall for the UDP traffic via the
external interface (ppp0?) with the peer's (public) ip-address and port to
And vice versa! No more and no less!
All traffic between the cipe interface with the local (loopback) interface
(lo)and the LAN-interface (eth0?) should be allowed, unless you have special
reasons not to.

Note: Your last remark in your firewall script (in dutch, translated:)..
> For some reasons the following rule doesn't work if used in the cipcb0
Of course it doesn't work in the cipcb0 chain: this UDP traffic isn't going
via the cipe interface. It is the UDP traffic transporting the encrypted
encapsulated IP-packets to the other cipe interface. (You also need a
similar OUTPUT rule: I couldn't find one...).


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]