<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: Damion Wilson <dwilson,AT,ibl,DOT,bm>
Subject: Re: Peter Gutmann + Slashdot
From: Les Mikesell <les,AT,futuresource,DOT,com>
Date: 24 Sep 2003 13:27:09 -0500
Cc: Guus Sliepen <guus,AT,sliepen,DOT,eu,DOT,org>, cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de
In-reply-to: <200309241510.54852.dwilson@ibl.bm>
Organization:
References: <200309231349.52932.dwilson@ibl.bm> <20030924172312.GD715@sliepen.eu.org> <200309241510.54852.dwilson@ibl.bm>

On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 13:10, Damion Wilson wrote:

> I think that we should emphasize that the design goals of our respective 
> projects seem to converge on the requirement of running multiple protocols 
> properly without timing problems. This seems to be the prime cause of what 
> Peter Gutmann deems "bad practice"

I'd also include the requirement to work behind another device
performing NAT.  At the time I chose CIPE this was not possible
with IPsec. I'm not sure if that is still the case, but after
several years of trouble-free operation I'm still happy with
CIPE.

---
   Les Mikesell
    les,AT,futuresource,DOT,com


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]