<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: Hans Steegers <steegers,AT,steegers,DOT,nl>
Subject: Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me thenecessityor benefit of a larger checksum.
From: "Eric M. Hopper" <hopper,AT,omnifarious,DOT,org>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:45:23 -0500
Cc: cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de
In-reply-to: <000d01c38695$0d3daa20$d620a8c0@pcw_hans.hnsasd.priv>
Organization: Omnifarious Software
References: <000d01c38695$0d3daa20$d620a8c0@pcw_hans.hnsasd.priv>

On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 09:22, Hans Steegers wrote:
> I am really not convinced there is huge problem here.
> Why not test your assumptions and see what happens?

In security, the default assumption is that there's a problem, not that
there isn't one.

Have fun (if at all possible),
--
There's an excellent C/C++/Python/Unix/Linux programmer with a wide
range of other experience and system admin skills who needs work.
Namely, me. http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper/resume.html
-- Eric Hopper <hopper,AT,omnifarious,DOT,org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]