<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: "Eric M. Hopper" <hopper,AT,omnifarious,DOT,org>
Subject: Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessity or benefit of a larger checksum.
From: hans steegers <steegers,AT,steegers,DOT,nl>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:04:54 +0200
Cc: cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de
In-reply-to: <1064853922.23120.60.camel@monster.omnifarious.org>
Organization: steegers
References: <000d01c38695$0d3daa20$d620a8c0@pcw_hans.hnsasd.priv> <1064853922.23120.60.camel@monster.omnifarious.org>

Op maandag 29 september 2003 18:45, schreef Eric M. Hopper:
> On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 09:22, Hans Steegers wrote:
> > I am really not convinced there is huge problem here.
> > Why not test your assumptions and see what happens?
> In security, the default assumption is that there's a problem, not that
> there isn't one.
Fine, compulsively assume what you want but it is not very convincing.
And again: keep my remarks in their context.

I am glad not being a wannabee security expert.
Now I suddenly understand "Have fun (if at all possible)"
Life must be a nightmare with Osama still on the loose.

Take care!
_____________________________________________

Hans Steegers


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]