<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: Hans Steegers <steegers,AT,steegers,DOT,nl>
Subject: Re: Data integrity check in CIPE - Please explain me the necessityorbenefit of a larger checksum.
From: James Knott <james.knott,AT,rogers,DOT,com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:24:13 -0400
Cc: CIPE-list <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
In-reply-to: <000f01c3868a$a9021280$d620a8c0@pcw_hans.hnsasd.priv>
References: <000f01c3868a$a9021280$d620a8c0@pcw_hans.hnsasd.priv>

Hans Steegers wrote:
Mark,


(PLEASE, everyone, when replying send only to list, not to person and

list -


I get two copies)

So what: come on, you have got a delete button. The list is sometimes very slow: it can take hours.

My comment on this is it would be nice, if the replies went to the list, instead of the original poster. That way, I wouldn't have to make sure to send to the list. If I want to send to both, reply all would do.



<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]