<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Subject: RE: Win 2000 Cipe Question....
From: "Mark Smith" <mark.smith,AT,avcosystems,DOT,co,DOT,uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:42:46 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <3FE1EBDB.83CCDAAB@gendesign.com>


It's at or before this point that we usually ask for detailed information on
your configuration (eg routing) and the IP addresses used.  If the public
addresses cannot be revealed, by all means change them as you see fit, so
long as it's still obvious what they should be.  Likewise, if you run both
ends in verbose mode and attach a copy of the messages they print, this
quite often points us to any problems.

For the Win32 end:

cipsrvr console

For the linux end:

ciped -o /etc/cipe/options cipe_debug=1

(change for your config file and any other options you may need)

Hope this helps,

Mark Smith - Avco Systems Ltd
email: mark.smith,AT,avcosystems,DOT,co,DOT,uk
Tel: +44 (0)1784 430996 Fax: +44 (0)1784 431078

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de [mailto:owner-cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de 
> Behalf Of
> Mike Gende
> Sent: 18 December 2003 18:03
> To: Damion Wilson
> Cc: cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de
> Subject: Re: Win 2000 Cipe Question....
> hello again,
> Made some changes and am seeing progress,  but could still use a little
> hand-holding. We have the cipe interface coming up on the Win2000
> laptop and
> configured on the Linux host on the same subnet. When we start
> the interface on
> the Win2000 box, we see a "new peer" on the Linux host for that
> connection.
> Typically, we're home free at this point. But, here's what happens:
> When looking at the "sent" and "received" counters via the Status
> of the Mobile
> Modem card and the Cipe device, we see only increments on the
> Modem Card. The
> Cipe device remains at 0 sent, 0 received despite explicit
> attempted use of the
> Cipe connection. Is that to be expected?
> Pings from the Linux hosts to the local IP address are seen to
> increment the
> "received" counter of the Modem Card, but (again) not the Cipe
> device. The Cipe
> tunnel must be being used or the Linux hosts wouldn't know where
> that IP address
> was. However, the Win2000 box doesn't respond to the ping. Pings
> from Win2000 to
> Linux don't seem to increment any "sent" counters so I'm not sure they are
> leaving the laptop. Nonetheless, we did see that "new peer"
> message on the Linux
> side and it was what we were expecting.
> Finally, in configuring the Cipe device, we left the Gateway
> field blank. We
> didn't want to use the Mobile Modem card as that address is
> dynamic. Could that
> be our trouble?
> I'm open to all critiques or advice. Many thanks again to Mr.
> Wilson for comments
> heretofore.
> Mike
> > When you are pinging, I presume that you are using the CIPE
> adapter's assigned
> > IP addresses.
> >
> > Make sure that the netmask for the CIPE adapter allows the
> packet for the
> > destination address to go that way. CIPE-Win32 acts like an Ethernet
> > interface, so the two peer addresses must be on the same subnet. CIPE on
> > Linux uses point to point semantics, so it doesn't care that the two
> > addresses are on different subnets.
> >
> > I didn't answer right away because I took a vacation without
> the laptop. This
> > appeared to make the wife happier for some reason.
> >
> > DKW
> --
> Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
> Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
> Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
> CIPE info and list archive:
> <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>

<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]