Tanel Kindsigo <tanel,AT,kivilinn,DOT,tartu,DOT,ee>|
Re: problem with cipe on x86_64|
Ravi Kumar <ravivsn,AT,rocsys,DOT,com>|
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:43:38 +0530|
Richard Gregory <R.Gregory,AT,liverpool,DOT,ac,DOT,uk>, cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de|
Did you by any chance have the transfer rates measured? If so, share
Tanel Kindsigo wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Richard Gregory wrote:
Tried to connect both machines with RedHat 7.3 router(cipe-1.4.5-9).
I used same configuration for both Whitebox machines. x86_32 worked well,
x86_64 did not. The connection was established, but if I tried to ping RH7.3
machine (193.40.x.x) from my Whitebox (192.168.1.213 behind NAT), then
tcpdump -i eth0 on WhiteBox showed that my ping requests were transferred
to the destination and replies even came back, but
tcpdump -i cipcb0 showed only icmp requests, not replies.Sounds like something else, does /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward = 1?
yes, it = 1, but it doesn't matter at all, on x86_32 i can run cipe even
with /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward = 0
actually, i don't have problem any more, tried vtun software instead
cipe and got much better transfer rates with logging onto samba domain
server over tunnel. so i don't need cipe any more.
Message sent by the cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de mailing list.
Unsubscribe: mail majordomo,AT,inka,DOT,de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>