<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de
Subject: Re: Cipe still vulnerable?
From: "Eric M. Hopper" <hopper,AT,omnifarious,DOT,org>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:24:22 -0800
In-reply-to: <20050223133853.GA15113@killerhippy.de>
Organization: Omnifarious Software
References: <20050223133853.GA15113@killerhippy.de>

On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 14:38 +0100, Sascha Wuestemann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> today I have found a link that claims cipe to be vulnerable for being
> easy to encrypt by third party and even being vulnerable to replay
> attacks.
> 
> The page is quite old but as it is representing a mail archive, it may
> be up-to-date?

I'm thinking that IPSEC + NAT-T will work out better for people.  Though
I think IKE is ugly.  :-(

Have fun (if at all possible),
-- 
The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they
be properly armed.  -- Alexander Hamilton
-- Eric Hopper (hopper,AT,omnifarious,DOT,org  
http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper) --

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]