<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]

To: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Subject: Re: CIPE server for 100's of CIPE links?
From: "Sven-Ola Tuecke" <sven-ola,AT,gmx,DOT,de>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:41:13 +0100
References: <20050302190208.5df74028@obelixx.edevau.net><200503021815.j22IF64r003574@mwave.heeltoe.com><20050304084103.16039c0c@obelixx.edevau.net><005f01c52094$9ca42960$0370a8c0@PCSvenOla><20050304112337.4e90c75f@obelixx.edevau.net><001201c520a7$ea76ab00$0370a8c0@PCSvenOla><20050304124451.7dedfdba@obelixx.edevau.net><001a01c520b1$2488c310$0370a8c0@PCSvenOla> <20050304141316.0a9221ca@obelixx.edevau.net>

Hey Andreas,

I shit on that hypothetical crypto discussion stuff - these blokes with their type of hypothetically blabla normally have only one effect: users refrain from switching on SSL in their outlook thinking "its too unsecure and too compilated even". For this reason the front doors are open normally ;-)

I'am only interessted in a more secure WRT->WRT communication. More secure than plaintext. Needs to be KISS. CIPE will do that. Windows? What's that?

Regards, Sven-Ola

----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Billmeier" <b,AT,edevau,DOT,net>
To: "Sven-Ola Tuecke" <sven-ola,AT,gmx,DOT,de>
Cc: <cipe-l,AT,inka,DOT,de>
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: CIPE server for 100's of CIPE links?


On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:56:03 +0100
"Sven-Ola Tuecke" <sven-ola,AT,gmx,DOT,de> wrote:

that sounds even better :-D So I definitely give that CIPE stuff a try > with my firmware project in the next couple of weeks. Many thanks for > your infos anyway.

Perhaps you have a look at the follwing url in advance: http://www.openwrt.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=454

There are some hypercritical opinions about CIPE, i hadn´t enough time or i was 2 lazy to read this stuff up to now, but i will.

I currently have ~30 Linux2Linux tunnels with CIPE in production state without any technical problems or securitiy issues. The major prob with CIPE *IMHO*, that development of the win32 port really is dead, currently there is a major bug in W-XPSP2 which causes virtual interfaces to not show up in the device list. This makes it (or will make it shortly) unusable in some cases.

Thats why I´m planning to migrate all my current cipe tunnels to OpenVPN, last waterhole is a cheap hardware router for this XPSP2 cases, only because i believe this would be less work than moving the whole network to OpenVPN.

On the other hand, there are interconnections with another isp using cipe, which i can´t migrate anyway, so i will have to keep 2 different protocols running....

I´ll tell more next week, i gotta check this small router first.

\B.


<< | Thread Index | >> ]    [ << | Date Index | >> ]